Baier, Annette. David Hume, Spinozist. 1993, https://dokumen.tips/documents/david-hume-david-hume-spinozist-239-external-things-that-is-needed-to-explain.html?page=5.

Bella, Daniel. “Eva Debray et al.: Spinoza et les passions du social”. Zeitschrift f\" ur philosophische Literatur, vol. 8, núm. 3, julio de 2020, pp. 30–37.

Bijlsma, Rudmer. “Spinoza, Hume, and the fate of the natural law tradition”. International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, vol. 76, núm. 4, agosto de 2015, pp. 267–83.

---. “Sympathy and affectuum imitatio: Spinoza and Hume as social and political psychologists”. South African Journal of Philosophy, vol. 33, núm. 1, enero de 2014, pp. 1–18.

Bodei, Remo. Geometría de las pasiones: miedo, esperanza, felicidad, filosofía y uso político. Fondo de Cultura Econ??mica, 1995.

Carrasco, Maria A. “La influencia de la teoría de las pasiones de Hume en el juicio moral de Adam Smith”. Filosofia Unisinos, vol. 21, núm. 3, noviembre de 2020, pp. 268–76. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2020.213.04.

Collier, Mark. “Hume’s Science of Emotions: Feeling Theory without Tears”. Hume Studies, vol. 37, núm. 1, 2011, pp. 3–18.

Cummings, Brian, y Freya Sierhuis, editores. Passions and Subjectivity in Early Modern Culture. Ashgate, 2013.

Ebbersmeyer, Sabrina, editor. Emotional Minds: The Passions and the Limits of Pure Inquiry in Early Modern Philosophy. De Gruyter, 2012.

Frank J. Leavitt. “Hume Against Spinoza and Aristotle”. Hume Studies, vol. 17, núm. 2, 1991, pp. 203–08.

Galvagni, Enrico. “Hume on Pride, Vanity and Society”. Journal of Scottish Philosophy, vol. 18, núm. 2, junio de 2020, pp. 157–73.

Grave, S. A., et al. “A Treatise of Human Nature”. The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 8, núm. 33, octubre de 1958, p. 379.

Guerrero, Leandro. “Subjetividad, Intersubjetividad y Corporalidad en la teoría humeana de las pasiones indirectas”. Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía, núm. 54, noviembre de 2017, p. 61. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v0i54.881.

Jane L. McIntyre. “Hume’s Passions: Direct and Indirect”. Hume Studies, vol. 26, núm. 1, 2000, pp. 77–86.

Jaquet, Chantal. Affects, Actions and Passions in Spinoza: the Unity of Body and Mind. Edinburgh University Press, 2018.

Kahn, Victoria, et al. Politics and the Passions, 1500-1850. 2009.

Lapidus, André. “The Valuation of Decision and Individual Welfare: A Humean Approach”. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, vol. 17, núm. 1, febrero de 2010, pp. 1–28. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1080/09672560903204502.

Lermond, Lucia. The Form of Man: Human Essence in Spinoza’s Ethic. E.J. Brill, 1988. Open WorldCat, https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004246607.

Liz, Jordan. “Hume’s Double Relation of Ideas and Impressions”. Dialogue (00122246), vol. 54, núm. 1, octubre de 2011, pp. 62–71. Humanities Source.

Lloyd, Genevieve. Enlightenment shadows. Oxford University Press, 2016.

---. Routledge philosophy guidebook to Spinoza and The ethics. Routledge, 1996.

---. Spinoza: Context, Sources, and the Early Writings. Taylor & Francis, 2001.

---, editor. Spinoza: critical assessments. Routledge, 2001.

Lordon, Frédéric, y Gabriel Ash. Willing Slaves of Capital: Spinoza and Marx on Desire. Verso, 2014.

Lordon, Frédéric, y Andy Bliss. Imperium: structures and affects of political bodies. 2022.

Lordon, Frédéric, y Antonio Oviedo. La sociedad de los afectos: por un estructuralismo de las pasiones. 2018.

Martin, Kelly. “On the origin of Hume’s philosophy in the passions”. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 184, abril de 2021, pp. 860–73.

Maxwell, Vance. “The Formalist Treatment of Spinoza”. Dialogue, vol. 25, núm. 2, 1986, pp. 337–48. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1017/S001221730004885X.

---. “The Philosophical Method of Spinoza”. Dialogue, vol. 27, núm. 1, 1988, pp. 89–110. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217300019508.

Ordieres, Alejandro. “Importancia Del Contexto Histórico En La Filosofía: El Caso de La Filosofía Moral de David Hume”. Alpha (Osorno), núm. 46, julio de 2018, pp. 233–47. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-22012018000100233.

Pickavé, Martin, y Lisa Shapiro, editores. Emotion and Cognitive Life in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2012.

Qu, Hsueh. “The simple duality: Humean passions”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 42, núm. S1, febrero de 2012, pp. 98–116.

Renz, Ursula. The Explainability of Experience: Realism and Subjectivity in Spinoza’s Theory of the Human Mind. Oxford University Press, 2018.

Richard H. Popkin. “Hume and Spinoza”. Hume Studies, vol. 5, núm. 2, 1979, pp. 65–93.

Sangiacomo, Andrea. Spinoza on Reason, Passions, and the Supreme Good. Oxford University Press, 2019.

Schmitter, Amy M. “17th and 18th Century Theories of Emotions”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, editado por Edward N. Zalta, Summer 2021, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2021. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/emotions-17th18th/.

---. 17th and 18th Century Theories of Emotions > Spinoza on the Emotions (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Summer 2018 Edition). el 19 de marzo de 2019, https://web.archive.org/web/20190319134921/https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/emotions-17th18th/LD5Spinoza.html.

Vance Maxwell. The Dialectic Of Enlightment: A Critique Of Recent Spinoza- Hume Scholarship. 2002, https://vdocuments.net/the-dialectic-of-enlightment-a-critique-of-recent-spinoza-the-dialectic-of.html?page=1.

Vesey, Godfrey Norman Agmondisham. Inner and Outer: Essays on a Philosophical Myth. St. Martin’s Press, 1991.

Wetlesen, Jon, editor. Spinoza’s Philosophy of Man: Proceedings of the Scandinavian Spinoza Symposium 1977. Universitetsforl, 1978.

Wim Klever. “Hume Contra Spinoza?” Hume Studies, vol. 16, núm. 2, 1990, pp. 89–105.

---. “More About Hume’s Debt to Spinoza”. Hume Studies, vol. 19, núm. 1, 1993, pp. 55–74.